| Name |
|---|
| Zygar, Caroline |
| Hagemeyer, Birk |
| Pusch, Sebastian |
| Schönbrodt, Felix D. |
| Title | From motive dispositions to states to outcomes: Research data of an intensive experience sampling study on communal motivational dynamics in couples |
|---|---|
| Original Title | Von Motivdispositionen zu Zuständen zur Wirkung: Forschungsdaten einer umfangreichen Experience-Sampling-Studie zu kommunalen Motivationsdynamiken in Paaren |
| Citation | Zygar, C., Hagemeyer, B., Pusch, S., & Schönbrodt, F.D. (2018). From motive dispositions to states to outcomes: Research data of an intensive experience sampling study on communal motivational dynamics in couples [Translated Title] (Version 1) [Files on CD-ROM]. Trier: Center for Research Data in Psychology: PsychData of the Leibniz Institute for Psychology Information ZPID. https://doi.org/10.5160/psychdata.zrce16dy99 |
| Language of variable documentation | German |
| Responsible for Data Collection | Zygar, Caroline; Hagemeyer, Birk; Pusch, Sebastian; Schönbrodt, Felix D. |
| Data Collection Completion Date | 2016 |
| Dataset Publication | 2018 |
| Dataset ID | zrce16dy99 |
| Study Description | 152 individuals from 77 heterosexual couples completed an online preliminary questionnaire on dispositional implicit and explicit motives, global relationship satisfaction, personality, satisfaction with life and decision-making in intimate relationships. 130 of these individuals took part in an experience sampling study spanning two weeks, answering questions about their momentary motivation, affect, state relationship satisfaction, behaviors and experiences in their relationship five times a day. Afterwards, 117 individuals provided feedback, assessed their relationship quality during the two weeks and answered a self-reflection questionnaire. The study was conducted to examine motivational dynamics in couples and its relevance for relationship satisfaction. |
| Hypotheses | In an intimate relationship individuals have to negotiate different goals, such as when and how much time to spend together (a communion goal), or whose opinion to follow when making shared decisions (an agentic goal). We are interested in explaining
- how situational circumstances in everyday life interact with motive dispositions to generate motivational states, such as a need to see the partner, - how couples regulate their individual motivations, and - what consequences specific dyadic behavioural patterns have for everyday and overall relationship outcomes, such as relationship satisfaction. Specifically, we suggest that the occurrence and regulation of everyday motivational states in a couple relationship mediate the links between individual motives as dispositions and relationship outcomes. |
| Keyphrase | implicit dispositional communion motive & everyday motivational dynamics & relationship outcomes in couples; agentic & communal motives; experience sampling method; PACT & & SWLS & BFI-S; 76 couples |
| Funding | German Research Foundation |
| Rating | Coding of the implicit motives was realized by trained coders. |
| Classification | Motivation & Emotion Marriage & Family Personality Traits & Processes |
|---|---|
| Controlled Terms | Couples Relationship Satisfaction Motivation Affiliation Motivation Achievement Motivation Agency |
| Research Method Description | Questionnaire Data |
|---|---|
| Classification of Data Collection | Combined Standardized Survey Instruments (Combination of various standardized sections) |
| Research Instrument | The following standardized instruments were used:
1: Partner-Related Agency and Communion Test (PACT). 2: The ABC of Social Desires. 3: Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI). 4: Positive – Negative Relationship Quality (PN-RQ) Scale (own translation to German). 5: Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). 6: Revised Blood & Wolfe (1960) scale for decision-making intimate relationships (own translation to German). 7: The Unified Motive Scales. 8: BFI-S. 9: Self-reflection and insight scale (own translation to German). 10: Adapted Affect Grid (own translation to German). |
| Data Collection Method | Collection without the presence of the investigator
- online - other: Experience-Sampling with Smartphone (ESM) |
| Time Points | repeated measurements |
| Survey Time Period | Experience Sampling Method (ESM) over a period of 2 weeks is used asking participants to answer questions about their mood, relationship satisfaction, motivational states, the current situation’s as well as the past situation’s features, and to give an appraisal of their own as well as their partner’s behavior 5 times a day at semi-random time points within a time frame of 9,5 hours per day. This time frame was adapted to the participants’ preferred times, with starting times ranging from 8:00 to 10:30 and ending times ranging from 21:30 to 24:00. Participants registered for participation and filled in an online preliminary questionnaire before starting the ESM part of the study. For the ESM part of the study, the participants used their own smartphones. After the two weeks of experience sampling had finished, the participants filled in additional online feedback questionnaires. |
| Characteristics | Due to technical problems, one couple started late and finished the ESM part on December 25th. In order to eliminate potential bias due to Christmas holidays, the last two study days of this couple were excluded from our analyses. One “couple” participated without actually being a couple; the data from these participants was excluded. |
| Population | German-speaking, mainly student sample, heterosexual couples |
| Experimental Pool | Couples |
| Sample | Convenience sample;
Participants using non-compatible smartphones as well as homosexual individuals were not eligible for participation. |
| Subject Recruitment | Recruition: Announcements, newsletter, facebook, personal contacts
Motivation: Reminder after one week, course credits and raffle of Amazon vouchers depending on response rate |
| Sample Size | 77 couples |
| Return/Drop Out | Mean comliance of ESM were 84%. |
| Gender Distribution | 50% female subjects (n=76)
50% male subjects (n=76) |
| Age Distribution | 18-40 years |
| Special Groups | - |
| Country | Germany |
| Region | - |
| City | - |
| Variables | - |
| Data Status | Complete Data Set |
|---|---|
| Original Records | Individual recordings using a computerized survey method (subject-related data files) |
| Transformation | The transmission of the original recordings into data matrices required complex experimental steps explained in the provided R scripts 1_data_preparation.R, create_esm_dat_file.R, create_fb_dat_file.R und create_preq_dat_file.R. Data of the Partner-Related Agency and Communion Test (PACT) were coded by trained coders, coding instructions can be found in Hagemeyer & Neyer (2012). |
| Description | Research data of coded PACT-stories |
|---|---|
| File Name | zrce16dy99_fd2.csv |
| Data Content | 152 cases, 524 variables |
| Data Points | 152*524=79648 data points |
| Variables | Information forthcoming |
| MD5 Hash | 7044f351db142a05c064697dc46c6779 |
| Description | Research data of the Experience Sampling part of the study (wide format) |
| File Name | zrce16dy99_fd4.csv |
| Data Content | 9897 rows, 117 variables |
| Data Points | 9897*117= 1157949 data points |
| Variables | Information forthcoming |
| MD5 Hash | 5323eea0483df171fa1c7942dbb34f68 |
| Description | Research data of Experience Sampling, longformat |
| File Name | zrce16dy99_fd3.csv |
| Data Content | 296523 rows, 19 variables |
| Data Points | 296523*19 = 5633937 data points |
| Variables | Login time (1), completed time (1), event index (1), event name (1), item name (1), event start time (1), event timeout time (1), event state (1), event started time (1), event completed time (1), result index (1), item tree (1), item started time (1), item completed time (1), result (1), day (1), answered (1), event lag (1), code (1) |
| MD5 Hash | 525801e9d1eb278b07a3e268bbc372c2 |
| Description | Research data of feedback questionnaire |
| File Name | zrce16dy99_fd5.csv |
| Data Content | 130 rows, 37 variables |
| Data Points | 130*37= 4810 data points |
| Variables | Information forthcoming |
| MD5 Hash | df219998ef382aac861d0d1fd46b5fa5 |
| Description | Research data of the preliminary questionnaire |
| File Name | zrce16dy99_fd1.csv |
| Data Content | 233 sessions, 186 variables |
| Data Points | 233*186 = 43338 data points |
| Variables | Information forthcoming |
| MD5 Hash | 7374e442ad3479d941adc27a14a2f673 |
| Description | File Name |
|---|---|
| Preregistration by Baumann, Zygar, Schönbrodt: "A dyadic study on the effect of communal motivation and conflict on relationship satisfaction and mood." | Preregistration_by_Baumann_Zygar_Schoenbrodt.pdf |
| Preregistration by Zygar & Schönbrodt: "From motive dispositions to states to outcomes An intensive experience sampling study on motivational dynamics in couples - Study 1." | Preregistration_by_Zygar_Schoenbrodt.pdf |
| Items of Experience Sampling | esm_items.pdf |
| Instructions of the training for Experience Sampling | esm_training.pdf |
| Questionnaire | fb-items.pdf |
| Images for the items "mood"" and ""ipc""" | Images_for_esm_items.pdf |
| Information about item sets | Item_sets.pdf |
| Items der Vorbefragung | preq_items.pdf |
| R-script for data preparation | 1_data_preparation.R |
| R-script for data analysis | 2_analyses.R |
| R-script for transformation and aggregation of raw data | create_esm_dat_file.R |
| data_preparation_PACTs.R | |
| R-script for transformation and aggregation of raw data | create_fb_dat_file.R |
| R-script for creation of data file Preliminary questionnaire data: record_matrix.csv and pact_coding_data: record_matrix.csv from raw data | create_preq_dat_file.R |
| Information of R version and packages used | R_session_info.txt |
| Codebook of research data file zrce16dy99_fd1.csv, preliminary questionnaire | zrce16dy99_kb1.csv |
| Codebook of research data file zrce16dy99_fd2.csv, coded PACT-stories | zrce16dy99_kb2.txt |
| zrce16dy99_kb3.csv | |
| Codebook of research data file zrce16dy99_fd4.csv, Experience Sampling part of the study (wide format) | zrce16dy99_kb4.csv |
| Codebook of research data file zrce16dy99_fd5.csv, feedback questionnaire | zrce16dy99_kb5.csv |
| Matching table for couple (paarid) and subject ID (code_new) | couple_matching_data.csv |
| Publications Directly Related to the Dataset |
|---|
| Zygar, C., Hagemeyer, B., Pusch, S., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2018, in press). From motive dispositions to states to outcomes: An intensive experience sampling study on communal motivational dynamics in couples. European Journal of Personality |
| Utilized Test Methods |
|---|
| Bell, K. J. (2008). Intimate partner violence on campus: A test of social learning theory (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania). |
| Blood, R., & Wolfe, D. (1960). Husbands and wives. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. |
| Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index (translated to German by Greischel, Johnson & Schmukle). Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 572–583. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572 |
| Gerlitz, J. Y., & Schupp, J. (2005). Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten persoenlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP. DIW Research Notes, 4, 2005. |
| Glaesmer, H., Grande, G., Braehler, E., & Roth, M. (2011). The German Version of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). Psychometric properties, validity, and population-based norms. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000058Datensatz 0240901 |
| Grant, A. M., Franklin, J., & Langford, P. (2002). The self-reflection and insight scale: A new measure of private self-consciousness. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 30(8), 821-835. |
| Hagemeyer, B., & Neyer, F. J. (2012). Assessing implicit motivational orientations in couple relationships: The Partner-Related Agency and Communion Test (PACT). Psychological Assessment, 24, 114–28. doi:10.1037/a0024822Datensatz 0251363 |
| Hagemeyer, B., Neyer, F. J., Neberich, W., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2013). The ABC of Social Desires: Affiliation, being alone, and closeness to partner. European Journal of Personality, 27, 442–457. doi:10.1002/per.1857Datensatz 0271434 |
| Rogge, R. D., Fincham, F. D., Crasta, D., & Maniaci, M. R. (2017). Positive and negative evaluation of relationships: Development and validation of the Positive – Negative Relationship Quality (PN-RQ) Scale. Psychological Assessment, 29, 1028–1043. doi: 10.1037/pas0000392 |
| Russel, J. A., Weiss, A., & Mendelsohn, G. A. (1989). Affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 493-502. |
| Schönbrodt, F. D., & Gerstenberg, F. X. R. (2012). An IRT analysis of motive questionnaires: The Unified Motive Scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 725–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.08.010Datensatz 0262652 |